Convention for the Suppression of
Unlawful Acts Against the Safety of Maritime Navigation, 1988
Entry into force: 1 March 1992
Protocol for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts Against the Safety of Fixed Platforms Located on the Continental Shelf, 1988
Adoption: 10 March 1988
Entry into force: 1 March 1992
The Protocol extends the requirements of the Convention to fixed platforms such as those engaged in the exploitation of offshore oil and gas.
Introduction
Resolution A.584(14) Measures to prevent unlawful acts
MSC Circular Measures to prevent unlawful acts
Convention aims
Amendment procedure
2005 Protocols
Introduction
Concern about unlawful acts which threaten the safety of ships and the security of their passengers and crews grew during the 1980s, with reports of crews being kidnapped, ships being hi-jacked, deliberately run aground or blown up by explosives. Passengers were threatened and sometimes killed.
In November 1985 the problem was considered by IMO's 14th Assembly and a proposal by the United States that measures to prevent such unlawful acts should be developed by IMO was supported.
Resolution A.584(14)
The Assembly adopted resolution A.584(14) Measures to prevent unlawful acts which threaten the safety of ships and the security of their passengers and crew which notes "with great concern the danger to passengers and crews resulting from the increasing number of incidents involving piracy, armed robbery and other unlawful acts against or on board ships, including small craft, both at anchor and under way."
The IMO Assembly directed the Maritime Safety Committee to develop, on a priority basis, detailed and practical technical measures, including both shoreside and shipboard measures, to ensure the security of passengers and crews on board ships. The measures were to take into account the work of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) in the development of standards and recommended practices for airport and aircraft security.
In December 1985 further support came from the United Nations General Assembly which called upon IMO "to study the problem of terrorism aboard or against ships with a view to making recommendations on appropriate measures."
MSC Circular
The MSC in 1986 issued a Circular (MSC/Circ.443) on Measures to prevent unlawful acts against passengers and crews on board ships - which states that Governments, port authorities, administrations, shipowners, shipmasters and crews should take appropriate measures to prevent unlawful acts which may threaten passengers and crews. The Circular gives guidelines on measures that can be taken - with application to passenger ships engaged on international voyages of 24 hours or more and port facilities which service them.
In November 1986 the Governments of Austria, Egypt and Italy proposed that IMO prepare a convention on the subject of unlawful acts against the safety of maritime navigation 'to provide for a comprehensive suppression of unlawful acts committed against the safety of maritime navigation which endanger innocent human lives, jeopardize the safety of persons and property, seriously affect the operation of maritime services and thus are of grave concern to the international community as a whole."
Convention aims
The proposal was supported, and in March 1988 a conference was held in Rome which adopted the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation.
The main purpose of the convention is to ensure that appropriate action is taken against persons committing unlawful acts against ships. These include the seizure of ships by force; acts of violence against persons on board ships; and the placing of devices on board a ship which are likely to destroy or damage it.
The convention obliges Contracting Governments either to extradite or prosecute alleged offenders.
Amendment procedure
IMO may convene a conference of States parties to the Convention for the purpose of revising or amending the convention, at the request of one third or ten States Parties, whichever is the highest.
2005 Protocols
Adoption: 14 October 2005
Entry into force: The amended Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts Against the Safety of Maritime Navigation will enter into force ninety days after the date on which twelve States have either signed it without reservation as to ratification, acceptance or approval, or have deposited an instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession with the Secretary-General.
The amended Protocol requires ratification from three States which are also party to the SUA Convention but it cannot come into force unless the 2005 SUA Convention is already in force.
Status: see Status of Conventions
Amendments to the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts (SUA) Against the Safety of Maritime Navigation, 1988 and its related Protocol, were adopted by the Diplomatic Conference on the Revision of the SUA Treaties held from 10 to 14 October 2005. The amendments were adopted in the form of Protocols to the SUA treaties (the 2005 Protocols).
2005 Protocol to the SUA Convention
Among the unlawful acts covered by the SUA Convention in Article 3 are the seizure of ships by force; acts of violence against persons on board ships; and the placing of devices on board a ship which are likely to destroy or damage it.
The 2005 Protocol to the SUA Convention adds a new Article 3bis which states that a person commits an offence within the meaning of the Convention if that person unlawfully and intentionally:
·
|
when the purpose of the act, by
its nature or context, is to intimidate a population, or to compel a
Government or an international organization to do or to abstain from any act:
|
|
|
-
|
uses against or on a ship or
discharging from a ship any explosive, radioactive material or BCN
(biological, chemical, nuclear) weapon in a manner that causes or is likely
to cause death or serious injury or damage;
|
|
-
|
discharges, from a ship, oil,
liquefied natural gas, or other hazardous or noxious substance, in such
quantity or concentration that causes or is likely to cause death or serious
injury or damage;
|
|
-
|
uses a ship in a manner that
causes death or serious injury or damage;
|
·
|
transports on board a ship any
explosive or radioactive material, knowing that it is intended to be used to
cause, or in a threat to cause, death or serious injury or damage for the
purpose of intimidating a population, or compelling a Government or an
international organization to do or to abstain from doing any act;
|
|
·
|
transports on board a ship any BCN
weapon, knowing it to be a BCN weapon;
|
|
·
|
any source material, special
fissionable material, or equipment or material especially designed or
prepared for the processing, use or production of special fissionable material,
knowing that it is intended to be used in a nuclear explosive activity or in
any other nuclear activity not under safeguards pursuant to an IAEA
comprehensive safeguards agreement; and
|
|
·
|
transports on board a ship any
equipment, materials or software or related technology that significantly
contributes to the design, manufacture or delivery of a BCN weapon, with the
intention that it will be used for such purpose.
|
Under the new instrument, a person commits an offence within the meaning of the Convention if that person unlawfully and intentionally transports another person on board a ship knowing that the person has committed an act that constitutes an offence under the SUA Convention or an offence set forth in any treaty listed in the Annex. The Annex lists nine such treaties.
The new instrument also makes it an offence to unlawfully and intentionally injure or kill any person in connection with the commission of any of the offences in the Convention; to attempt to commit an offence; to participate as an accomplice; to organize or direct others to commit an offence; or to contribute to the commissioning of an offence.
A new Article requires Parties to take necessary measures to enable a legal entity (this could be a company or organization, for example) to be made liable and to face sanctions when a person responsible for management of control of that legal entity has, that capacity, committed an offence under the Convention.
Boarding provisions
Article 8 of the SUA Convention covers the responsibilities and roles of the master of the ship, flag State and receiving State in delivering to the authorities of any State Party any person believed to have committed an offence under the Convention, including the furnishing of evidence pertaining to the alleged offence.
A new Article 8bis in the 2005 Protocol covers co-operation and procedures to be followed if a State Party desires to board a ship flying the flag of a State Party when the requesting Party has reasonable grounds to suspect that the ship or a person on board the ship is, has been, or is about to be involved in, the commission of an offence under the Convention.
The authorization and co-operation of the flag State is required before such a boarding. A State Party may notify the IMO Secretary-General that it would allow authorization to board and search a ship flying its flag, its cargo and persons on board if there is no response from the flag State within four hours. A State Party can also notify that it authorizes a requesting Party to board and search the ship, its cargo and persons on board, and to question the persons on board to determine if an offence has been, or is about to be, committed.
The use of force is to be avoided except when necessary to ensure the safety of officials and persons on board, or where the officials are obstructed to the execution of authorized actions.
Article 8bis includes important safeguards when a State Party takes measures against a ship, including boarding. The safeguards include: not endangering the safety of life at sea; ensuring that all persons on board are treated in a manner which preserves human dignity and in keeping with human rights law; taking due account of safety and security of the ship and its cargo; ensuring that measures taken are environmentally sound; and taking reasonable efforts to avoid a ship being unduly detained or delayed.
Extradition
Article 11 covers extradition procedures. A new Article 11bis states that none of the offences should be considered for the purposes of extradition as a political offence. New article 11ter states that the obligation to extradite or afford mutual legal assistance need not apply if the request for extradition is believed to have been made for the purpose of prosecuting or punishing a person on account of that person's race, religion, nationality, ethnic origin, political opinion or gender, or that compliance with the request would cause prejudice to that person's position for any of these reasons.
Article 12 of the Convention requires States Parties to afford one another assistance in connection with criminal proceedings brought in respect of the offences. A new Article 12bis cover the conditions under which a person who is being detained or is serving a sentence in the territory of one State Party may be transferred to another State Party for purposes of identification, testimony or otherwise providing assistance in obtaining evidence for the investigation or prosecution of offences.
Amendment procedure
Amendments to the Articles in the Convention require acceptance by a requisite number of States. However, the Annex, which lists the treaties under which offences can be considered for the purpose of the SUA Convention, has a special amendment procedure.
The treaties listed are:
1
|
Convention for the Suppression of
Unlawful Seizure of Aircraft, done at The Hague on 16 December 1970
|
2
|
Convention for the Suppression of
Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Civil Aviation, done at Montreal on 23
September 1971
|
3
|
Convention on the Prevention and
Punishment of Crimes against Internationally Protected Persons, including
Diplomatic Agents, adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on
14 December 1973
|
4
|
International Convention against
the Taking of Hostages, adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations
on 17 December 1979
|
5
|
Convention on the Physical
Protection of Nuclear Material, done at Vienna on 26 October 1979
|
6
|
Protocol for the Suppression of
Unlawful Acts of Violence at Airports Serving International Civil Aviation,
supplementary to the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against
the Safety of Civil Aviation, done at Montreal on 24 February 1988
|
7
|
Protocol for the Suppression of
Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Fixed Platforms Located on the
Continental Shelf, done at Rome on 10 March 1988
|
8
|
International Convention for the
Suppression of Terrorist Bombings, adopted by the General Assembly of the
United Nations on 15 December 1997
|
9
|
International Convention for the
Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism, adopted by the General Assembly of
the United Nations on 9 December 1999
|
2005 Protocol to the 1988 SUA Protocol
The amendments to the 1988 Protocol for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Fixed Platforms Located on the Continental Shelf reflect those in the 2005 Protocol to the SUA Convention.
New article 2bis broadens the range of offences included in the Protocol. A person commits an offence if that person unlawfully and intentionally, when the purpose of the act, by its nature or context, is to intimidate a population, or to compel a Government or an international organization to do or to abstain from doing any act, uses against or on a fixed platform or discharges from a fixed platform any explosive, radioactive material or BCN weapon in a manner that causes or is likely to cause death or serious injury or damage; or discharges from a fixed platform, oil, liquefied natural gas, or other hazardous or noxious substance, in such quantity or concentration, that it causes or is likely to cause death or serious injury or damage; or threatens, with or without a condition, as is provided for under national law, to commit an offence.
New article 2ter includes the offences of unlawfully and intentionally injuring or killing any person in connection with the commission of any of the offences; attempting to commit an offence; participating as an accomplice; organizing or directing others to commit an offence.
Thank you so much for sharing such an awesome blog...
ReplyDeleteMarine Engineering College In India